HR News Articles

Have we just stumbled on the biggest productivity increase of the century?


fizkes/Shutterstock


John Quiggin, The University of Queensland

One of the most striking responses to the COVID-19 pandemic has been the sudden shift of around half the workforce to working at home.


In many cases, this was combined with an equally sudden shift to home schooling.


Contrary to what might have been expected, working from home was one part of the pandemic response that went remarkably smoothly. Most kinds of office work continued almost as if nothing had changed.


Discussion of the crisis has mostly worked on the assumption that a return to something like the pre-crisis “normal” is both inevitable and desirable.


But the unplanned experiment we have been forced to undertake suggests we might have stumbled upon a massive opportunity for a microeconomic reform, yielding benefits far greater than those of the hard-fought changes of the late 20th century.


The average worker spends an hour on commuting every work day. Remarkably, this is a figure which has remained more or less stable since Neolithic times, a finding known as Marchetti’s Law. (The same observation has been attributed to Bertrand Russell.)



Marchetti’s Law says we spend about an hour travelling to work whatever the era.


If working from home eliminated an hour of commuting, without changing time spent on work or reducing production, the result would be equivalent to a 13% increase in productivity (assuming a 38-hour working work).


If half the workforce achieved such a gain, it would be equivalent to a 6.5% increase in productivity for the labour force as a whole.


For a comparison, let’s look at the radical microeconomic reforms of the 1990s, including privatisation, deregulation and national competition policy.


In 1995 the main advocate of these reforms, the Productivity Commission, then called the Industry Commission, estimated they would increase national income by 5.5%.


In retrospect, that estimate appears to have been over-optimistic.


Although there was an upsurge in measured productivity growth in the mid-1990s, the total increase relative to the long-term trend was less than 1 percentage point per year above normal. Low productivity growth since then has wound back those gains.


These gains are big, compared to those we sweated on


Even so, those reforms were, and to a large extent still are, widely seen as a crucial contributor to economic prosperity.


So, an improvement of 6.5% would be a huge benefit. It would be enough over a few years to offset the economic costs of the lockdown and many other impacts of the pandemic.


But, as in the case of microeconomic reform, this initial estimate may be misleading. And even if there are real benefits on average, it’s important to ask who will get them and who, if anyone, will lose.


A study by Harvard and New York University economists finds that people working from home spend around 48 minutes more time per day connected to their offices, leaving an average gain in free time of only 12 minutes per day.




Read more: Vital Signs: Shorter meetings but longer days – how COVID-19 has changed the way we work




It seems likely, however, that at least some of this time is spent on household tasks, especially to the extent that workers had to take on child care and home schooling during the lockdown period. And, as well as saving commuting time, workers also save the monetary costs of commuting and at least some of the time spent getting ready for work.


On balance, it seems clear that on average working from home yields net benefits.


However, workers for whom social contacts at work represent a significant “fringe benefit” will lose that benefit, while other workers who value privacy or separating work and social life will gain a benefit.


It’ll be harder for managers…


Similarly, those who rely on chatting to colleagues to develop ideas will lose something relative to those who prefer more systematic approaches to obtaining information relying on electronic contact.


Another group of workers who might lose from remote working are middle managers.


To the extent that management depends on “presenteeism”, that is, physically keeping an eye on workers, remote working presents problems.


Intrusive checking on computer activity is likely to be resisted and evaded. Managers will have to learn to manage by objectively assessing results rather than observing what people do, and to get that evidence accepted further up in the hierarchy.


…manageable for employers


For employers, the shift to working from home has had little immediate impact. Workers wages haven’t changed and, at least in the short run, neither has spending on office space.


But, in the long run, remote working offers the possibility of much greater flexibility in hiring. Some employers such as Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg have already floated the idea of paying workers less because they can now live in cheaper locations, setting the stage for future conflict.


For the most part, disputes over sharing the benefits of remote office work will be hashed out between employers, workers and unions, in the ordinary workings of the labour market.




Read more: Thinking about working from home long-term? 3 ways it could be good or bad for your health




But what about the other half of the workforce, who don’t have the option of working from home? In particular, what about the mostly low-paid service workers who depend on people coming into offices?


If the productivity gains made possible through remote work are to be shared by the entire community, substantial government action will be needed to make sure it happens.


Most obviously, the higher rate of JobSeeker allowance has helped us get through the pandemic without the upsurge in suicide and other measures of social distress predicted by many. Returning to the poverty-level unemployment benefit (the old Newstart) would be a disaster.


We’ll need to change the way we support workers


The pandemic has shown how whole sectors of the economy, such as aged care, rely on casual workers piecing together multiple jobs, with no access to standard conditions like sick leave. Younger workers in particular suffer from underemployment and difficulties in making the transition to permanent full-time work.


What will be needed is both an expansion of publicly funded employment in a wide range of services, including aged care, and a reversal of trends towards casual and contract employment.


Disastrous though it has been, COVID-19 has taught us a lot about ourselves and about how our economy and society work. If we learn these lessons, we might be able to benefit and mitigate at least some of the harm done by the disaster.The Conversation


John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Jobs Just For You, The HR Professional

Our weekly or daily email bulletins are guaranteed to contain only fresh employment opportunities


More info

Latest Jobs

HR Business Partner
New South Wales

HR Business Partner - Australia
Queensland

HR Officer
Queensland

Senior HR Advisor
New South Wales

Human Resources Business Partner
South Australia

People and Culture Manager
Queensland

Talent Acquisition consultant - Contract
New South Wales

Onboarding Coordinator
Queensland

APS6 E-Learning Designer - Contract
Australian Capital Territory

EL2 Director People - Contract
Australian Capital Territory

Talent Acquisition Coordinator
South Australia

HR Business Partner - Contract
New South Wales

APS5 ICT Training Officer
Australian Capital Territory

Talent Manager
Victoria

HR Specialist - Contract
Western Australia

Senior Advisor Capability Development - Contract
Australian Capital Territory

Senior Advisor Capability Development - Contract
South Australia

Senior Advisor Capability Development - Contract
Queensland

Senior Advisor Capability Development - Contract
New South Wales

Workforce Change Advisor
South Australia

Learning & Development Manager
South Australia

WHS Advisor (Rehab/RTW) APS6 - Contract
New South Wales

HR Manager - ANZ
New South Wales

Senior Advisor Capability Development - Contract
Victoria

Blue Collar Recruiter - Contract
Western Australia

HR Manager - Contract
Northern Territory

Recruitment Advisor - Remote Residential
Western Australia

Internal Recruitment Consultant / Coordinator - Contract
New South Wales

People & Culture Advisor
New South Wales

Recruitment Advisor
Queensland

APS6 eLearning Developer - Contract
Australian Capital Territory

Employee Relations Advisor
Victoria

HR Business Partner
South Australia

Organisational Development Manager
Victoria

HR Business Partner
Western Australia

HR Coordinator
Victoria

Workforce Relations Specialist
South Australia

HR Advisor
New South Wales

Head of Talent
New South Wales

Clinical Educator - Aged Care
Tasmania

Senior HR Advisor/Team Leader
South Australia

HR Business Partner
Western Australia

APS6 Workforce Planning - Contract
Australian Capital Territory

HR Business Partner
Victoria

Senior Internal Recruiter
New South Wales

Recruitment Coordinator - Contract
Queensland

HR Coordinator (Mat Leave Contract) - Full or Part Time
Victoria

Talent Acquisition Officer - Contract
Western Australia

HR Manager - Project
Queensland

Senior L&D Advisor
New South Wales

People & Culture Business Partner
New South Wales

HR Recruitment Advisor - Contract
Queensland

Human Resources Business Partner
Northern Territory

Employee Relations Consultant - Fixed term
Victoria

Learning Specialist (icare) - Contract
New South Wales

Senior Human Resources Consultant - Contract
Western Australia

People & Culture Business Partner - Talent Acquisition
Queensland

APS6 Industrial Relations Advisor - Contract
Australian Capital Territory

HR/Recruitment Coordinator
Western Australia

Recruitment Advisor - Contract
Queensland

Recruitment Advisor - Contract
Western Australia

Change - Organisational Development Consultant - Contract
Queensland

HR & Office Manager
New South Wales

HR Business Partner
Northern Territory

Learning Project Manager - Contract
New South Wales

HR Business Partner
New South Wales

General Manager - People & Culture, CX (12m FTC) - Contract
New South Wales

HR Advisor - Contract
Victoria

People & Culture Advisor
New South Wales

HR & Recruitment Advisor - Contract
Victoria

Internal Talent Acquisition Specialist
Victoria

HRIS Analyst - Contract
Victoria

People and Culture Business Partner - Contract
Victoria

Change Manager - Contract
Queensland

Human Resources Business Partner
Queensland

HR Operations Manager
Western Australia

Part Time HR Generalist - Contract
New South Wales

Head of Talent Acquisition
New South Wales

L&D Specialist - Contract
Western Australia

HR Officer
Western Australia

Browse All Jobs