Jobs in HR

What the compromise IR deal means for wage negotiations and pay rises

The Albanese government’s Secure Jobs, Better Pay Bill is all set to become law, after Workplace Relations Minister Tony Burke revealed amendments to secure the support of the Greens and ACT independent David Pocock in the Senate.

The government and the trade union movement see the bill as crucial to reinvigorating collective bargaining and lifting wages, especially for lower-paid workers.

Much of the debate has focused on what the bill does with multi-employer agreements – and many of the government’s concessions concern that issue.

But if the wage stagnation of the past decade is to be overcome, it will likely be through less-heralded reforms.

Multi-enterprise agreements

While there is much to be said for industry or sector-wide wage agreements, the Fair Work Act does not allow them, and that will not change under the bill. Unrelated employers can choose to make a “multi-enterprise agreement”. But they cannot be required to bargain and few such agreements are made.

The bill offers the option of two new types of multi-enterprise agreement: supported bargaining agreements, and single-interest employer agreements. Both will require authorisation from the Fair Work Commission before formal bargaining can commence.

Supported bargaining

The supported bargaining system will replace the largely unused provisions for “low-paid bargaining”.

It is intended for industries in which (single) enterprise bargaining has proved difficult, such as child care or aged care. The Fair Work Commission must be satisfied it is appropriate for the nominated employers to bargain together, having regard to existing pay and conditions, and any identifiable common interest (for example, being reliant on government funding).

Single-interest bargaining

The single-interest bargaining stream is potentially broader.

It can apply in any sector other than commercial construction (now specifically excluded from all types of multi-enterprise agreement). However, a combination of the original drafting and subsequent concessions will make it difficult for unions to gain a single-interest authorisation.

Unions will not be able to rope in small business employers (to be defined as those with fewer than 20 regular employees) without their consent.

A larger employer can only be included without their consent if a majority of its affected employees want to bargain.

Employers of any size can only participate if they are sufficiently “comparable” to be regarded as having a common interest.

An employer cannot be included if it has a current single-enterprise agreement, or is negotiating a replacement for one that expired in the previous nine months.

No authorisation will be granted unless the Fair Work Commission is satisfied it is in the public interest.

The pathways to agreement

If a union can gain permission to pursue one of the new types of multi-enterprise agreement, it will be able to draw on supports for bargaining that were not there under the current law.

Employers named in a supported bargaining or single-interest authorisation would be obliged to bargain in good faith.

Employees with a bargaining representative could take industrial action – although only if approved in a ballot of represented employees at their workplace.

The Fair Work Commission could assist the parties to reach agreement. In the case of supported bargaining, that might include requiring the involvement of a head contractor or funding body with a “degree of control” over workers’ pay and conditions.

Most significantly – and as with prolonged negotiations for a single-enterprise agreement – the commission could resolve an “intractable” bargaining dispute by arbitration. Just the threat of such intervention should improve the chances of gaining agreement.

This, arguably, is the biggest reform to bargaining in the bill.

So when do the wage rises happen?

It will take time to test out the new provisions.

Meeting the onerous requirements for a single-interest authorisation will be difficult, except for employers already bargaining together (such as franchisees or faith-based schools).

If a union can secure majority support at a particular enterprise, it can probably already bargain there.

Any attempt to let existing deals expire and then shift to multi-employer bargaining may be met by public-interest objections – unless the employers concerned also see value in a more collective approach.

Supported bargaining has a greater chance of taking off, especially in low-paid industries where employers may support higher pay if assured of not being at a competitive disadvantage.

Other pathways

The bill offers other routes to higher wages, through “work value” adjustments to award rates, and improved access to equal remuneration orders. That focus on pay equity, also evident in the bill’s prohibition of pay secrecy clauses, may prove just as useful in delivering wage rises for feminised sectors.

More generally, the bill seeks to simplify the process of making enterprise agreements and getting them approved.

This includes changes to the “better off overall test”, which ensures negotiated pay and conditions are set above the award minimum, not below. (The government has agreed to fix a drafting problem that might have created a loophole for employers to exploit.)

Overall, the Secure Jobs, Better Pay Bill may speed up some bargaining processes and, over time, help reverse the trend away from agreement-making.

But if real wage rises are to return, it will more likely be because governments are prepared to fund them – and employers are willing to trade some of their profits for economic growth.

Andrew Stewart, John Bray Professor of Law, University of Adelaide

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.