HILDA finds working from home boosts women’s job satisfaction more than men’s, and that has a downside
Mark Wooden, The University of Melbourne; Esperanza Vera-Toscano, The University of Melbourne, and Inga Lass, The University of Melbourne
The shift to working from home is unlikely to reverse.
Data from the HILDA (Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia) Survey released on Monday show the proportion of Australians working “most hours” from home jumped from around 6% before the pandemic to 21% in 2020. Unpublished data available to researchers shows a further jump to 24% in 2021.
While the rise was most pronounced in Victoria (which was in lockdown when the 2020 survey was conducted) there were big increases in all states except Tasmania.
Working from home increased in every industry but agriculture. It increased the most in industries dominated by office jobs.
Easier to work at home, or harder?
The 2020 survey asked those who had increased their hours working at home whether their ability to do their jobs was “much better”, “a little better”, “about the same”, “a little worse”, or “much worse”.
There are arguments in each direction. On one hand, working from home can give workers greater control of their time, making it easier to balance work and non-work activities. And at-home workers often report fewer meetings and interruptions, meaning work at home can be less stressful.
On the other hand, working from home can blur boundaries between work and non-work time, pushing work into unsocial hours. And it can mean workers spend more time isolated, without the opportunity to interact with colleagues.
What the survey found was that the proportion of these workers who reported negative effects on their ability to do their job (42%) far outweighed the proportion who reported positive effects (24%).
Another way of looking at the result is to say that given that one-third of those working more at home reported little change in their ability to do the job, more than half found things no worse.
Although the number reporting negative effects outnumbering the number reporting positive effects might seem surprising, it is less surprising given that many of the people who suddenly had to work from home in 2020 lacked dedicated workspaces and had to share space with other household members working at home and children forced to learn remotely.
In non-pandemic times, when working from home is voluntary and home workspaces are better set up, assessments are likely to be more positive.
Women feel better off, men not much
The 2020 HILDA Survey found minimal effects of working from home on job satisfaction. But preliminary unpublished research we have undertaken on data from the 2021 survey paints a different picture – one divided on gender lines.
Focusing on people employed in both 2019 and 2021, and controlling for worker characteristics, we find a significant positive association between changes in the extent of working from home and changes in job satisfaction among women, but not men.
Furthermore, the improvement among women is concentrated on women with children.
The largest increase is found for those who work two days in the workplace and three days at home.
For mothers who shifted to the two-day/three-day arrangement, average job satisfaction increased by around 0.9 of a point on the scale of zero to ten, which amounted to a 12% improvement.
The findings suggest the main benefit for workers from working from home arises from the improved ability to combine work and family responsibilities – something that matters to women more than men as they continue to shoulder the bulk of home and care work.
Greater opportunities to work from home should thus lead to the greater involvement of mothers in paid work. This is a good thing. But there is at least one potential problem.
Working from home can be a trap
It is well-established that the workers visibly present in a workplace are more likely to be promoted and get extra responsibilities than the workers who are not.
If women become less visibly present at a faster rate than men, their efforts are less likely to be recognised and they are more likely to be excluded from tasks and roles that enhance their promotion prospects.
Unless attitudes change, this downside of working from home is likely to become more apparent for women.
Mark Wooden, Professorial Fellow, The University of Melbourne; Esperanza Vera-Toscano, Senior research fellow, The University of Melbourne, and Inga Lass, Senior research fellow, Federal Institute for Population Research (BiB). Honorary Senior Fellow, Social and Political Science, The University of Melbourne
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Jobs Just For You, The HR Professional
Our weekly or daily email bulletins are guaranteed to contain only fresh employment opportunities
Latest Jobs
Senior HR Business Partner - 12 mth Contract
New South Wales
L&D Consultant - Contract
New South Wales
Human Resources Business Partner
South Australia
HR & Recruitment Officer - Contract
Queensland
People and Performance Consultant
Queensland
HR Business Partner - Contract
Western Australia
Executive Manager People and Culture
Tasmania
HR Business Partner
Queensland
HR Business Partner
Western Australia
HR Coordinator - Contract
Queensland
Safety and Systems Advisor - Contract
Queensland
HR Advisor
New South Wales
HR Advisor - Compensation & Benefits
Victoria
LMS Administrator - Contract
Western Australia
A06 Senior HR Consultant - Contract
Queensland
Human Resources Consultant - Contract
Queensland
Senior HR Coordinator - Retail - Contract
New South Wales
Human Resource Business Partner
Tasmania
HSE Supervisor
Tasmania
HR Advisor
Victoria
Senior HR Advisor - Contract
Western Australia
Safety Advisor - Contract
Queensland
HR Business Partner
Western Australia
HR Coordinator - Contract
Queensland
ER Specialist
Western Australia
Talent Acquisition Partner - Contract
New South Wales
Injury Management and Wellbeing Advisor - Contract
Western Australia
Diversity & Inclusion Senior Manager
New South Wales
Talent Acquisition Partner
Queensland
Learning and Development Coordinator - Contract
Queensland
Principal People and Culture Advisor - Contract
Queensland
HR Advisor
Victoria
HR Business Partner
New South Wales
L & D Coordinator - Contract - Part Time
Western Australia
Workers Compensation Officer
Queensland
HR Business Partner - Contract
New South Wales
Legal Practice Capability - Recruitment - Contract
Queensland
Senior HR Advisor
Queensland
Health, Safety, and Environmental Advisor
Queensland
Wellbeing, Health & Safety Officer - Temp, Part Time
New South Wales
Senior Safety Manager - Contract
Queensland
Safety Administrator - Contract
Queensland
HR Advisor - Contract
New South Wales
APS6 ICT Workforce Coordinator - Contract
Victoria
HR Advisor - Contract
New South Wales
Industrial Relations Specialist - Contract
Western Australia
Senior People and Culture Business Partner - Contract
Queensland
WHS Manager
New South Wales
People and Culture Business Partner
Queensland
HR Manager
New South Wales
HR & Payroll Officer
New South Wales
HR Business Partner
New South Wales
Performance Management Specialist
Queensland
HR / IR Business Partner - Contract
Queensland
HR Business Partner
Western Australia
Senior Reward Analyst - Contract
Western Australia
HR Business Partner
Western Australia
Industrial / Employee Business Partner
South Australia
Industrial Relations Manager
Queensland
People and Culture Officer
South Australia
Senior HR Advisor - Contract
New South Wales
HR & Payroll Officer
New South Wales
APS6 HR Generalist
Australian Capital Territory
People & Culture Officer - Contract
Victoria
General Manager of People & Quality
Tasmania
Principal Information Advisor - Contract
Queensland
EL1 Assistant Director/APS 6 Senior Advisor
Queensland
HR Business Partner
Western Australia
People Partner - Contract
Victoria
HR Business Partner
Victoria
Workforce Recruiter
Queensland
HR Advisor - Contract
New South Wales