HR News Articles

Australia’s new pay equality law risks failing women – unless we make this simple fix


Mark Humphery-Jenner, UNSW Sydney

The Albanese government’s efforts to address the gender pay gap are laudable. Despite all the attention given to the issue over the past decade or so, sectoral pay discrimination is very real and workplace biases persist.


But the federal government’s new tool to address the problem, the Workplace Gender Equality Amendment Bill, may not achieve much.


The amendment to the Workplace Gender Equality Act (enacted by the Gillard Labor government in 2012) requires all companies with more than 100 employees to report their “gender pay gap”.


Much like the Modern Slavery Act, the idea is that public reporting will concentrate employers’ attention on the problem, leading to greater gender equality.


But will it?


The problem is the type of data companies must report to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency, which has been publishing pay-gap statistics since being established by the Workplace Gender Equality Act in 2012.


As with the other statistics the agency has published over the past decade, the new amendment requires only publishing simple aggregates:



The Agency must publish aggregate information, for each relevant employer for each reporting period, for the purpose of showing the employer’s performance and progress in achieving gender equality in relation to remuneration for the employer’s workforce"



This may seem like a positive step. But aggregate numbers – which in practice translates into reporting summary statistics – do not help us to either identify or understand the pay gap. Those aggregates also don’t help us come up with the right fixes.


To do that requires better data that enables more precise analysis for the factors affecting pay disparities.


The problem with averages


Averages are ubiquitous in statistics. They can serve a important service, such as identifying trends. I’ll even be using averages to illustrate a few points.


But their limitations should be understood. They are particularly problematic when it comes to areas of endemic inequality, such as income.


Consider a company with 101 employees, one being the founder and chief executive. The other 100 employees, split 50/50 between men and women, are all paid the same salary.


But suppose the chief executive pays himself ten times as much as the other employees. This isn’t ridiculous; the average CEO of a listed company in Australia is paid 132 times the average income. This creates a 17.6% gender pay gap.


Now consider a similar company, run by a “tech bro” who doesn’t draw a salary but does pay every woman 2% less than every man. The aggregate numbers will show no gender pay gap.


In the first case, where there’s no explicit gender discrimination, aggregate numbers can be misread as indicating there is. In the second case, actual gender discrimination is obscured.




The WGEA’s pay gap results


Workplace Gender Equality Agency's pay gap results, 2013-14 to 2021-22
Workplace Gender Equality Agency, CC BY




Poor data leads to poor analysis


The widespread use of averages often skew our sense of things. If you compare your own income to the Australian average (A$90,324 a year in 2021), the probability is you’ll feel left behind. But if you compare yourself to the median income – the income at which half the population earns more, and half less – you’ll feel much better: it’s only $62,868 a year.


Bad data leads to bad analysis, and bad policy responses.


Here’s another scenario. Consider our first company again. The CEO is concerned about the publicity from reporting a 17% gender pay gap to the agency. So he employs his wife as deputy CEO, paying her five times the rest of the staff, and cuts his own salary by half. He no longer has a gender pay gap to report.


This is progress of a kind, but not the progress needed to address the complex causes of gender pay inequality for ordinary people.


How to fix this problem


So how then to improve the reporting of gender pay statistics generally?


Reporting median statistics would help mitigate the skewing problem with averages. Unless the government demands this, the agency will more than likely keeping taking the same approach as over the past decade – relying on averages.


There’s also a case for companies to report other relevant factors that could influence pay, such as qualifications, skill, tenure, seniority and productivity.


This would enable the Workplace Gender Equality Agency to provide more sophisticated analysis, breaking down the factors contributing to the figures that get the headlines.


The agency defines equal pay as “men and women performing the same work are paid the same amount”. To achieve this, it is essential to ensure apples are being compared with apples. This is only possible if we control for the factors that can influence pay, and don’t lose the necessary nuance.


Blunt data does not properly inform us about the pay gap, why it arises, nor how to solve it. This risks policy responses that focus on the wrong issues and which achieve little.


Decision-makers, both in public and private sectors, risk making bad decisions on poor-quality data. The wrong fixes could even make things worse. We will not eradicate the gender pay gap using bad statistics.The Conversation


Mark Humphery-Jenner, Associate Professor of Finance, UNSW Sydney


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Jobs Just For You, The HR Professional

Our weekly or daily email bulletins are guaranteed to contain only fresh employment opportunities


More info

Latest Jobs

HR Coordinator - 12 mth Contract
Victoria

Senior Learning and Development Officer
Victoria

HR Manager - Contract
Queensland

HR Advisor - Recruitment - Contract
Queensland

Employee Relations Consultant
Victoria

HR Advisor - Contract
Queensland

HR & Recruitment Coordinator - Contract
New South Wales

Head of People Services - Contract
Victoria

HR Advisor - Contract
Queensland

WHS Consultant - Contract
Western Australia

Principal Advisor (Workplace Mental Health) - Contract
Queensland

P&C Business Partner - Contract
Victoria

HR Manager - Contract
Queensland

HR / Payroll Systems Specialist - Contract
New South Wales

Human Resources Co-ordinator
South Australia

HR Business Partner
New South Wales

HR Advisor - Business Improvement - Contract
Queensland

Human Resources Advisor - Case Management - Contract
Queensland

L&OD Consultant - Contract
New South Wales

Interim APAC HRM
Australian Capital Territory

Interim APAC HRM
Tasmania

Interim APAC HRM
South Australia

Interim APAC HRM
Western Australia

Interim APAC HRM
Northern Territory

Interim APAC HRM
Queensland

Interim APAC HRM
Victoria

Head of People & Culture
New South Wales

Interim APAC HRM
New South Wales

People & Culture Manager
New South Wales

HR Business Partner - Contract
Victoria

Human Resources Advisor - Contract
Queensland

Talent Acquisition Advisor - Contract
Western Australia

Human Resources Manager - FT or PT
Australian Capital Territory

HR Manager - Contract
Western Australia

HR Advisor
New South Wales

HR Officer - Contract
Queensland

People and Culture Business Partner
South Australia

Senior TA Business Partner - Contract
Victoria

Senior P&C Advisor - Contract
Victoria

Strategic HR Business Partner - Contract
Victoria

Remuneration & Benefits Advisor - Contract
Victoria

P&C Business Partner
Victoria

P&C Business Partner
Victoria

HR Manager ANZ
New South Wales

HR Advisor
Victoria

HR Business Partner
New South Wales

Health & Safety Coordinator
Queensland

Principal HR Advisor - Contract
Queensland

HR Advisor
Victoria

Internal Recruiter - Tech - Contract
New South Wales

Recruitment Co-ordinator - Contract
South Australia

Employee Relations Consultant - Contract
Victoria

HR Assistant
Queensland

HR Consultant - Contract - Part Time
Western Australia

Diversity & Inclusion Governance Specialist - Contract
Victoria

Diversity & Inclusion Specialist - Contract
Victoria

HR Administrator
New South Wales

EL1 Assistant Director, Policy - WHS/RCM
Australian Capital Territory

HR Coordinator
Victoria

APS5 Recruitment
Australian Capital Territory

Workforce Planner - Contract
Queensland

Recruitment Officer - Contract
Western Australia

HR Coordinator - Contract - Part time
Victoria

Talent Partner - Contract
New South Wales

HR Advisor - Contract
Queensland

Instructional Designer - Contract
Queensland

HRIS Implementation Specialist - Contract
Western Australia

FIFO HR Business Partner - Contract
Western Australia

Recruitment Advisor - Contract
Western Australia

Senior HR Advisor
Western Australia

Talent Acquisition Advisor - Contract
New South Wales

HR Business Partner
Victoria

Industrial Relations Manager
New South Wales

HR Administrator - Contract
Victoria

Senior HR Business Partner - Contract
New South Wales

Learning Designer | Special Measures - Disability Inclusion
Victoria

Recruitment Advisor - Contract
Western Australia

People & Culture Manager
New South Wales

People & Culture Manager
Victoria

Browse All Jobs